Score: 9

"Awesomesauce."

submission: G.I.T. Episode 1

date: May 31, 2007

I'm not one for sprite movies, but it was all pretty original. Knowing you, you've put loads of effort into this, and it translates. The script was pretty tight- I notice alot of amateur flashes seem to have been made up as they went along. This one's been thought about. Style, well. Yeah, it had the style, that's for sure. The sound is all there, although I can't give you full score on that cause it's not got a huge amount. Violence? Well, the computer caught fire, I guess. Humor goes back to the script- You've put in just the right amount of everything. Added to favs.

-Kamizoroe.

Score: 6

"You've got talent."

submission: Family Guy :Fighting Game

date: December 4, 2006

I can understand that you put alot of effort into this, alot which many of us do not have the commitment or skill to make.

Graphics: You're a very talented drawer, I'll give you that. The opening sequence was too good, if anything- It made me think slightly too highly of the game. Although this proves to me that you could make a perfectly good animation. I have to say, though, when Peter finished off the chicken, in the little animation between the fight and the 'You win' screen, he didn't look quite like Peter. Can't put my finger on why. I'm just a little paranoid. 8/10.

Style: Pretty generic. There's nothing new about the art style or gameplay, but you've done it well enough, so I can't complain. 5/10.

Sound: Nice Peter clips, music was okay. Nothing new on there, to my knowledge, but the quality was consistent. A bit more variety would have been nice. The odd exclamation of Peter yelling something during the fight, or whatever. However, I'm aware that you'd have to add alot, otherwise, I'd be here complaining about how it was grating listening to them repeat the same phrases repeatedly. 5/10 (I'd make it 5.5, but I'm pretty undecided about the sound.)

Violence: Eh, wasn't too violent, but it's not something you want to sit a 6 year old in front of. Unless you enjoy making six-year olds feel bad. It's a fighting game. What more do you want? 7/10.

Interactivity (Gameplay): Didn't really think it was that great. Reminded me of SSBM, however, there were only three to five hit kills, the jewels were too hard to reach, and it was kinda hard to tell what part of the level you were on. Try to add more depth to certain sections so it doesn't look like they're floating. 4/10

Humor: I don't really watch FG that much, it's funny, but it's not really my style of humor. Nevertheless, I respect Seth MacFarlane's work, and I respect what you've done with it. 5/10.

Overall: 6/10. I feel a bit harsh giving you that score, but I've given better submissions than this 7s and 8s. I only checked this out cause my friend was playing it, and the Giant Chicken scene was one of my favourite FG scenes. Add more features. If you have more time, add an AI (I've read your comments on that, so I get that you weren't able to add one you were satisfied with), and add a few more characters and levels. A Family Guy:Fighting Game V2 would be nice to see in the future. Good luck with your flash, whatever you choose to do.

Score: 8

"The New Numa of flash games."

submission: Neon 2

date: October 14, 2006

Graphics: Good, the scrolling map was nice, KISS rule applies (Keep It Simple, Stupid) so no complaints here. The animation was smooth and flowing, although it didn't look as sharp as the original.

Style: The first one oozed style. This one's stylish, but it's lost some of its charm. (thus the summary. This one's clearly been made with alot more skill, but it lacks the feel of the first one.. I can't really explain it. I think it may be attributed to the scrolling map).

Sound: Bleep. Miap. Bleep. Bleep. Dull BG music. Not exactly Mozart, is it? But there's not really much more you can do to the sound, so I'll give it a 7 anyway.

Violence: Chevron blows up squares and hexagons. Sometimes the squares separate into little squares. ZOMG. Don't worry about it, though. If the squares bled, and vomited intestines every time you shot them, that'd just be grating.

Interactivity: It's a game, and a very playable one. Whatmoredayawant.

Humor: Ha. The shape blew up the other shape. Not meant to be funny, and it isn't.

Overall: 8 This is a very good game, just not a great sequel. Don't worry about a Neon 3. If you're going to use that scrolling engine, I'd suggest more detailed graphics. But its up to you. I know how many painful hours it takes to make flash from friends.

Score: 7

"Pretty good."

submission: Virtual PSP

date: October 14, 2006

Graphics: Not much to find fault in here. Couldn't really make it better without needing an entire studio.

Style: Yeah, well presented, some decent stuff here.. Not much more to say, except for the fact you couldn't really understand the text in Mad-Libs and that it never really felt like a proper flash game... Just.. A PSP simulator. That's just my oppinion.

Sound: Yeah, everything was in the right place there... In the Foamy film, wasn't that a Lemon Demon song?

Violence: Foamy's head gets blown off. Painful imagery in Mad Libs. Couple of the pictures. Not much to say here.

Interactivity: What it says on the box. 10. Well done.

Humor: Yeah, pretty funny over all. Especially the foamy bit and the 'Wade takes over newgrounds' article. Poor Stamper...

Overall: Good for wasting 10 minutes, no bugs, good for a laugh. A bit limited, but I'm sure you can improve it, no problem. Peace.

-Kamizoroe.

Score: 8

"I don't know much about Naruto, so bare with me.."

submission: Ultimate Naruto Fanflash5

date: October 11, 2006

Graphics:7- Its the same style as alot of your other works. If it aint' broke, don't fix it. Its very simplified, but I'm guessing that's what you were going for for comedy's sake.

Style:9- I'm reiterating. You've got your own recognisable style, and it works very well.

Sound: The choice of music was excellent, and everything fitted with the lyrics (City's breaking down on a camel's back.. *Konoha leaf* etc.) Violence: I'll give you a 3 because Sasuke wanted to kill you.

Interactivity: 0-I'm not expecting 'SingStar: Naruto edition' any time soon. Its a movie, don't worry about interactivity.

Humor:10- The bits that I got (We're only up to the Chuunin exams where I live, and its very hard to find copies of the manga) were Hilarious. I'm sure that almost everyone else that reviewed it loved all of it.

Overall: 8- One point down because it wasn't quite perfect (Sound quality, graphics, etc) and another point down because it wasn't original. (You've done several of these, duh.) However, I've read your Author's comments, and I'm completely aware that you're working on original stuff. Good luck with it, I'll be keeping my eyes out on it.

Peace.

Score: 10

"How long have I waited for this..."

submission: The Little Jamurai II

date: June 11, 2006

I remember watching the first little Jamurai a few years back, and I always hoped there'd be a sequel. And it was alot better than I thought it'd be. The animation was slick, and the graphics were unique. The violence was good too, cause it wasn't as fake as most flash films. Keep at it. All my 5 are belong to this.

Score: 8

"Brilliant."

submission: Hyakugojyuuichi!!

date: June 1, 2006

The music is suprisingly catchy, although I think I'd shoot myself if this started playing after an episode of pokemon. Oh, and RatchetSly..I think I'm right to say, This is Hyakugojyuuichi!!, you're reviewing a totally different movie, namely Hyakugojyuuichi 2003/forever. But along with the Japanese PokeRap, this made the genre of animutation, so I respect you greatly for that.

Score: 6

"The person before me hit the nail on the head."

submission: Boardin!!

date: May 17, 2006

It was good, but..The board was a little hard to control as you'd often wipe out whenever you did anything, and there was no sound (Unless I just have a messed up flash player, then I'm sorry) . If you could adjust the board to have smoother movement, and add decent sound, this would be a really good addition to the portal. I loved the graphic styles, and want to see more of this. Keep at it.

Score: 10

"Sad, but Ironic."

submission: "Fun With Suicide"

date: April 30, 2006

You can't help but feel bad that livecorpse commited suicide after making films like these. RIP.

Score: 9

"That was good, but.."

submission: Livecorpse's Last Movie

date: April 30, 2006

... It makes me sad that this movie is the last he'll ever make. And that you can't help but think that this desperately violent movie was one of the last things he did before his death..
Rest in Peace, Adam Fulton.